Contact us




Was Times Square Car Bomber A Double Agent?


Was Shahzad lured by an undercover CIA operative into commiting an act that would make him a hero among Muslims but also...a "useful idiot" for the New World Order CIA/Mossad/ ISI alliance. Was he framed?

Is Shahzad a "patsy", a scapegoat, a sucker, a fall guy OR is he a dual citizen and double agent for the CIA?

Some suggest Shahzad may have been “framed” by the United States so that it can exert more power over Pakistan. “It all seems too easy. Why would Shahzad leave without completing the job?” asked Shazaib Hassan, a small-business owner in Lahore.


Shahzad’s father, Baharul Haq, is a prominent, wealthy, and decorated Pakistan Air force Admiral who left his home in a posh area of Peshawar to avoid the media.




Why would the University educated Shahzad who is the son of an Air Force Admiral - pack an amateurish collection of VISIBLE explosive materials (clocks, propane, fertilizer and fireworks) into a traceable vehicle and park it where it would arouse the suspicions of passers-by? was he trying to get caught? Why would he make dozens of traceable cell phone calls to Pakistan? When he was arrested, why did he say, "I've been expecting you. Are you NYPD or FBI?" Why is Shazad being so cooperative and forthcoming with information?

Interior Minister Rehman Malik said on Wednesday that no links have yet been established between Shahzad and any terror groups, adding he will investigate whether the plot is in fact a “conspiracy” against Pakistan.


Like the staged underpants bomber incident, the foiled and inept Times Square car bomb incident also appears to be staged. The same problem-reaction-solution formula works every time for the ruling crime families whose New World Order agenda is a tyrannical world government.

Staged Problem? Bomber incidents.

Public Reaction? Predictable fear.

Planned Solution? More and more population control


May 05, 2010

written by Vitelius, Brainiac Conspiracy

It is amazing what ostriches we Americans can be. We scratch our heads and puzzle over possible motives: NYC Police commissioner Ray Kelly said on NBC's "Today" show that investigators do not yet know what factors may have triggered Shahzad's apparent transformation from a seemingly regular father and husband into a suspected terrorist.

"These are what we call unremarkable people who decide to kill innocent people," Kelly said. "That's what makes it so difficult."According to goverment spokesmen and the media, Muslims hate us for our freedom. Wrong! They hate us for invading and occupying their countries and for blowing up their mothers and fathers and kids and relatives? They hate us for stealing their resources, exploting and impoverishing their people and they hate us for making fun of their religion and everything they hold sacred.

How many innocent Pakistani civilians have been killed in the U.S. drone war in Pakistan? The number could be as high as 320 innocents, according to an analysis released today by the New America Foundation. That’s about a third of the 1,000 or so people slain in the robotic aircraft attacks since 2006. Reliable information from the drone strikes in Pakistan’s tribal areas is incredibly hard to come by. The government not only keeps news organizations out, it also blocks aid groups, like Doctors Without Borders. So analysts are forced to rely only press reports, which are themselves relying on second-hand accounts.

The result: wildly different estimates of who has died in the attacks. In April, the News of Pakistan claimed that Predator and Reaper attacks had only killed 14 militants; the rest were bystanders. Last month, the Long War Journal estimated that about 10 percent of the casualties were civilian. The New America study, lead by long-time terrorism researcher Peter Bergen, comes down somewhere in between.


But hey, nothing to look at here folks. No need to ask questions---just shuttle this creep down to Gitmo, toss him in the brig, and start profiling Muslim men along with all the Mexicans. Because looking for causal factors in terror attacks is only for bleeding-heart hippies anymore.Update: Or better yet, let's just take the advice of this great (zionist) patriot:

(Zionist ) Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) is planning to introduce a bill that would allow the government to take away citizenship from Americans who join foreign terrorist (human freedom) organizations. The proposal would amend current law that bars American citizens from fighting for foreign (freedom) armies at the price of losing their citizenship."I think it's time for us to look at whether we want to amend that law to apply it to American citizens who choose to become affiliated with foreign terrorist (freedom) organizations, whether they should not also be deprived automatically of their citizenship and therefore be deprived of rights that come with that citizenship when they are apprehended and charged with a terrorist act," Lieberman, who helms the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said on Fox News.

And this is a guy with a degree from Yale Law School. Jesus, our Republic is being run by idiots! Where is the logic in giving up our freedom to protect our freedom?



Your smallest donation helps. Thank you!