Home
About
Store
Action
Articles
Predictions
Donate
Links
Contact us
globe
NewsExtra

 

 

newsheadlines

Cancer Pandemic

February, 2015

http://www.helpfreetheearth.com

A pandemic is "an occurrence in which a disease spreads very quickly and affects a large number of people over a wide area or throughout the world."

If and when you get the cancer diagnosis, the diagnosis alone can kill you with the added stress on your immune system.

The moment you’re diagnosed with cancer, you become worth about $300,000 to the cancer industry.

In 2012, the reported spending on cancer treatment was 124.6 billion dollars. It's all blood money for a disease that the Big Pharma cancer industry has no interest in curing.

 

CANCER STATS - PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE

In the early 1900’s, the chances of getting cancer was 1 out of every 100 people. About fifty years ago the chances increased to 1 in 50. Today, it is less than 1 out of every 3 people get cancer. Soon, it will be 1 in 2.

WHY?

So what has changed?  How did we go from a  3% chance of contracting cancer to a 41% chance? It’s the advent of Big Pharma, Big Agri and Big Business.  They are getting rich off of poisoning Americans through the manufacture of toxic elements that we are exposed to on a daily basis.

Unless you live in a bubble and have no contact with manufactured items, outside air, or the sun, you are exposed to a staggering number of known and suspected carcinogens every day. (Check out THIS LIST to see the known and suspected carcinogens that are readily available in the United States.)

The statistics support that the cumulative build up of all these different toxins in the human body eventually results in cancer in many people.

First, the manufacturers and the “food” producers profit when we buy their poisoned goods. Then the medical system and pharmaceutical companies profit when we become ill and must fight cancer.

The drugs alone can cost over $100,000 per year, and that is on top of exorbitant costs for radiation, chemotherapy, and physician’s bills. In the United States, cancer is the #1 most expensive “per person” illness to treat. (source)

Why would those who profit want to prevent cancer when 124.6 billion DOLLARS PER YEAR is spent on treating it? There is a vested interest in this increase in illness and the people benefitting from it have no intention of reducing the cases of cancer.

THE CANCER BUSINESS

If you had a business selling something that made you well over a hundred billion dollars per year, would you take steps to eradicate the need for your business? Or would you make every effort for that money continue rolling in?

Take cancer, for example.  Don’t let all the media hype about “The Cure” fool you.  No one who is in a position to do so wants to end cancer because they are all making a killing on the big business of treatment, while ordinary people go broke, suffer horribly, and die.

There will never be a “cure” brought to market because there just isn’t enough profit in eradicating the disease entirely.  There will never be a governing body that protects consumers from being subjected to known carcinogens, because that too, will stop the cash from rolling in. A great deal of research is covered up and many potential cures are ignored and discredited because there is far more money in perpetuating illness than in curing it.

CANCER TREATMENT OPTIONS

If you get cancer, your options are:

1. Chemotherapy, which is refused by 75% of doctors, works only 2-3% of the time, and has been shown in a study to cause more cancer OR

2. You can utilize natural substances found in nature that science has shown are powerful Cancer Cures, with virtually no side effects.

Despite the horrid report card for chemotherapy treatment, people to this day continue to receive treatment, as doctors profit from each patient to whom they deal these toxic drugs.

You can refuse the barbaric conventional treatments that your doctor might offer you, and treat yourself safely, effectively, and inexpensively with one or more natural Cancer Cures. See the evidence. Decide for yourself whether you want to expose yourself to brutal poisons, or use substances provided by nature that will heal you without side effects.

THE UNTREATED LIVE LONGER

Chemotherapy-Treated Cancer Patients Die Sooner than No Treatment at All

As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good.”
– Alan Nixon, Ph.D., Past President of The American Chemical Society

After studying the life span of cancer patients for 25 years, Professor of Medical Physics and Physiology at Berkeley, California, Dr. Hardin B. Jones delivered a report, sending shockwaves through an American Cancer Society Seminar in 1969.

Dr. Jones’ 25-year study concluded that patients who are not treated with chemotherapy and other conventional treatments (surgery, and radiation) do not die sooner than patients who do.  In many cases, he reported, they live longer.

His timeless paper he titled “Demographic Consideration of the Cancer Problem,” and published in Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences (Series II, Vol. 18, pp. 298-333).

BREAST CANCER

Particularly disturbing was the doctor’s discovery about the breast cancer survival rates of women who had refused all conventional treatments (chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery).  His findings indicated that women with breast cancer who remained untreated lived four times longer than women who were treated with them.

“People who refused treatment lived for an average of 12 and a half years. Those who accepted other kinds of treatment lived on an average of only 3 years,” stated Dr. Hardin B. Jones.

Other researchers have conducted similar studies which came to similar conclusions.  “Those who refused medical procedures had a lower mortality rate than those who submitted” concluded Dr. Maurice Fox, Biologist from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, based on a study completed at the Harvard School of Public Health.

In the February 2, 1979 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, it published an article by Dr. Maurice Fox, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Based on studies conducted at the Harvard School of Public Health, Dr. Fox found many things, including:

  1. Complete mastectomy was no better than simple lump removal.
  2. The diagnosis of breast cancer was twice as frequent in 1975 than in 1935, and the death rate was also double, meaning no progress had been made in the attempt to cure cancer.
  3. A lower mortality rate was found in patients who refused medical procedures than those who submitted to conventional treatments.
  4. Early detection amounted to quicker treatment and earlier death.

A team of researchers from Israel, led by Dr. Michael Feldman conducted a study at the Weizmann Institute in 1978.

An article titled “Failure of Chemotherapy to Prolong Survival in a Group of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer,” was published in British medical journal The Lancet on March 15, 1980.  Read what it says:

“Overall survival of patients with primary breast cancer has not improved in the past 10 years, despite increasing use of multiple-drug chemotherapy for treatment of metastasis. Furthermore, there has been no improvement in survival from first metastasis, and survival may even have been shortened in some patients given chemotherapy…. Actuarial survival analysis … reveals no prolongation in overall survival, despite the increased use of multiple-drug chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The survival of the 78 patients who received chemotherapy from first detection of metastases (including single-agent chemotherapy) was no better than that of the 80 who did not receive chemotherapy. There was also no improvement in survival for those who received multiple-drug chemotherapy (66 patients)…. The fact that regressions of breast cancer had no influence on overall survival must reflect the inadequacy of present-day chemotherapy.”

HOW DEADLY IS CHEMOTHERAPY?

Chemotherapy is so lethal, that if the liquid is spilled, it can burn right through human flesh. 

This illustrates clearly just how toxic chemotherapy chemicals are.  Considering the outer skin of a person is actually better protected than our insides, just think what happens when this fluid is injected into the vein of a cancer patient.

So toxic are the chemicals used in Chemotherapy, that nurses administering it have to wear personal protective equipment, and follow strict security measures in case of any accidental spills of chemotherapy.

Spills larger than 5 cc. require:

  • Phone calls to 911, and to the Occupational & Environmental Safety Office – OESO.
  • Access to the affected area must be blocked off, and the area must be marked with warning signs
  • Donning the protective coveralls and two pairs of gloves (a latex pair for underneath the coveralls, and a rubber pair for on top) from the “Chemotherapy spill kit”.
  • Picking up broken glass using the scoop in the “Chemotherapy spill kit”.
  • Cleaning up liquids using spill pads.
  • Washing the spill area 3 times: Once with hydrogen peroxide, and two more times with a strong detergent.
  • If the chemotherapy drug comes in contact with the skin, eye, or airborne particles inhaled at any time during the procedure, they are instructed to go immediately to the emergency room.

If you like this site, visit our STORE and forward our link to friends.

http://www.helpfreetheearth.com

donate

Your smallest donation helps. Thank you!

Home