Contact us




World War III Starts This Month

September 07 , 2013


Obama clearly admits that the public doesn't want war but he's going to start it anyways.

He says it's not the public's decision to make. It's his decision.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee has already voted to authorize Obama to use force against Syria. Congress has not voted yet but Obama says he will take action against the Syrian regime with or without congressional approval.


Jewish Secretary of Hate, John Kerry made it clear in an interview with The Huffington Post that Obama has the right to bomb Assad if Congress votes "no".http://www.helpfreetheearth.com/news695_Kerry.htm

Reagan didn't get authorization for the 1983 invasion of Grenada or the 1986 bombing of Libya. Clinton didn't get permission from Congress in 1998 before launching cruise missiles at a suspected weapons facility in Sudan or before the Kosovo conflict. Obama himself didn't check with Congress before imposing a no-fly zone over Libya in 2011.


During a press conference at the G20 summit in St. Petersburg, Russia, Obama admitted that a war in Syria would be unpopular with the public.

“At the end of the day, I don’t persuade a majority of the American people that it’s the right thing to do,” said President Go-Bomb-Em, pretending to know what's best for the world. "Ultimately, you listen to your constituents, but you’ve got to make some decisions about what you believe is right for America."

"I was elected to end wars and not start them", said Obama with his tongue in his cheek, "but what I also know is that there are times where we have to make hard choices if we’re going to stand up for the things that we care about. And I believe that this is one of those times.”

At a press conference, Obama lied about a global consensus that the Assad regime used chemical weapons, when sources in many countries including Russia and China have produced evidence proving that it was the US sponsored rebels who carried out the attacks.

It's a popular myth in America and other fake democracies that the population decides on big issues that effect their lives. The corporate media monopolies try to win support but with without it, the policy is eat it and shut up.

According to Ron Paul, bombing Syria is a dress rehearsal for Iran.


What, exactly, are those two dangerous chemicals that need to be controlled via "arms control" regulations? You won't believe me when I tell you. They are:

sodium fluoride
potassium fluoride

It's the same sodium fluoride found in our water supply and toothpaste. It's the same toxic chemical that's routinely dumped into municipal water supplies all across the USA under the guise of "water fluoridation."

In fact, the forced feeding of sodium fluoride to the U.S. population is called a "public health" victory by the CDC, FDA and dentists everywhere. Yet this same chemical, when sold to Syria, is openly and repeatedly referred to as a "chemical weapon." This is true across the BBC, the Guardian, Daily Record and Sunday Mail, France24.com and literally thousands of other news websites.

According to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, any government "regime" that uses chemical weapons against its own people should be bombed / invaded / overthrown by a coalition of other United Nations members. By his own definition, then, the United States of America should now be invaded by the UN because the government uses a deadly chemical weapon -- sodium fluoride -- on its own people.

By implication, then, John Kerry is now calling for the UN to bomb the USA. As the international media now confirms, sodium fluoride is a chemical weapon, and this chemical weapon is used against the American people every single day in the water supply, a favorite attack vector for terrorists.

Evidence" of chemical weapons is nothing more than hair samples of people who drank sodium fluoride.

Secretary of Htate John Kerry is running around "pulling a George Bush" by claiming Syria has used weapons of mass destruction on its own population. Here's a sample of his claims:

"In the last 24 hours, we have learned through samples that were provided to the United States that have now been tested from first responders in east Damascus and hair samples and blood samples have tested positive for signatures of sarin." Kerry said this on NBC's Meet The Press.

But what, exactly, is he saying? That hair samples have tested positive for
"signatures" of sarin, not sarin itself. What is a "signature" of sarin? The fluorine element, which is of course the basis for sodium fluoride.

In other words, this "evidence" of chemical weapons in Syria may be nothing more than a collection of hair samples taken from people who drank fluoride. As this study shows on SCIENCE.naturalnews.com, hair analysis is a commonly-used practice for assessing exposure to fluoride. It concludes, "hair may be regarded as biomaterial of high informative potential in evaluating prolonged exposure to fluorides..."

Typically, this analysis is conducted with ICP-MS instrumentation, using a plasma torch that disintegrates all organic molecules, leaving only the resulting elements (fluorine). Tests done on Syrian citizens using ICP-MS would not be able to distinguish between sodium fluoride and sarin exposure in terms of the detection of elemental fluorine.

Read that again, because it's crucial to understanding the hoax being perpetrated by the White House: Tests on hair or other tissues, if done using ICP-MS (the most common elemental analysis technology used today), would not be able to distinguish between sodium fluoride and sarin.
See "Apocalypse: Are You Prepared"

New Half Price Sale! Free Shipping! 9 Best Sellers for $99! Click HERE

If you like this site, visit our STORE and forward our link to friends.



Your smallest donation helps. Thank you!